Fines for Violations of Military Registration at Enterprises: Who Is Liable and Why
Cost of services:
Reviews of our Clients
... our work on joint projects assured us of your high level of professionalism
Today, under martial law in Ukraine, military record keeping has become an area of heightened legal risk for both individuals and employers. Increased oversight by Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers, active inspections of military records at enterprises, and closer scrutiny of registration data have led to fines being imposed far more frequently. Liability may arise not only from serious violations but also from minor shortcomings such as documentation errors, missed deadlines, and similar issues.
For many businesses, these fines come as a surprise due to frequent legislative changes and the lack of a unified approach to enforcement in practice. Requirements are often interpreted differently by supervisory authorities, making compliance difficult without professional legal support. That is why understanding the grounds for liability, identifying who can be held responsible, and knowing the available options for defense and appeal is critically important. This issue directly affects not only financial outcomes but also overall business stability and legal security.
In this article, we examine which specific technical mistakes most often lead to maximum fines imposed by recruitment authorities, who is actually required to pay them, the company director or the person responsible for military records, and how to act to avoid turning the company budget into a source of funding for administrative penalties.
You might also like: Military Record Inspections by Recruitment Centers: Common Violations and How to Avoid Them
Who Is Liable for Violations of Military Record Keeping Rules
The common belief that responsibility for military record keeping violations applies only to individual citizens is incorrect. There is a particularly dangerous misconception that some company executives still hold: “If my employee has not updated their data or is avoiding the recruitment office, that is their personal problem.” In practice, this is not the case.
The law has shifted the focus of liability, and businesses are now under much closer scrutiny than individual citizens.
Who does the recruitment authority actually fine?
- Conscripts, military liable persons, and reservists. These individuals are responsible for their own compliance. This includes the obligation to be registered for military service, to update personal data in a timely manner, to report changes in place of residence, employment, or family status, and to appear at the Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center when summoned in accordance with the law.
Failure to update data or to appear in response to a summons results in a personal fine. - Employers, specifically company officials. This is the category where fines are higher and grounds for penalties are found most often. In practice, violations arise not only from a complete absence of military record keeping, but also from submitting inaccurate information, ignoring requests from Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers, or allowing employees to work without proper military registration documents.
Liability in this area is personal. This means that company directors, individuals responsible for military record keeping, HR specialists, and accountants bear individual responsibility for organizing and maintaining employee military records. As a result, an administrative protocol is issued not against the legal entity itself, but against the specific official who has been assigned these duties.
In practice, any company, regardless of its size or form of ownership, falls within a high risk zone. That is why liability for violations of military record keeping has long ceased to be a purely personal matter for individual citizens and has become an essential element of business legal security.
Understanding exactly who within your team signs the relevant documents and carries responsibility is the only effective way to protect your business from unpredictable fine-related expenses.
What Actions and Violations Lead to Fines in the Area of Military Record Keeping
In practice, fines for violations of military record-keeping rules are most often imposed on employers. This happens even in cases where a company does not see any serious wrongdoing in its actions.
The law places an obligation on company directors and designated responsible persons not merely to “have” military records, but to ensure that they are maintained properly, accurately, and on an ongoing basis. Any deviation from the established procedure is treated as grounds for administrative liability. For recruitment authorities, it makes no difference whether the violation was intentional or the result of an oversight by HR staff. If there is a procedural deviation, a fine follows.
Let’s break down four common traps businesses usually fall into:
- Imitation of record keeping instead of a real system. A typical scenario is “We have a folder with documents somewhere.” The absence of an actual military record-keeping system, or its purely formal existence, is a critical mistake.
This includes situations where no responsible person is formally appointed by order, records are not updated, and employee data is stored chaotically or is missing altogether. Even if some information exists in practice, such shortcomings are treated by supervisory authorities as a failure to fulfill the employer’s obligations. - Information exchange with Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers. This includes failure to submit information or delays in submission, providing incomplete or inaccurate data about military liable employees, as well as errors in personal details or status.
- Ignoring changes in legislation. A common situation is when companies do not monitor legislative updates and continue to maintain records under outdated rules, which automatically creates grounds for liability.
- “Blind” hiring. This is the most frequent cause of sanctions. A company hires a qualified specialist but fails to verify their military registration document, or the document turns out to be outdated or invalid. By signing an employment contract without a valid military document, the company effectively signs off on a fine.
In such cases, liability rests not with the employee but with the official who formalized the hiring. Similar consequences arise from improper organization of employee notifications and violations of the established procedure for interaction with Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers.
On the part of individual employees, mistakes most often relate to failure to notify authorities of changes in place of residence, employment, or other registration details, as well as a lack of understanding of their own obligations when interacting with Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers. Combined with employer errors, this creates situations in which liability may arise for both parties.
Such systemic shortcomings are the most common reason for the imposition of fines and, at the same time, often form the legal basis for successfully challenging decisions made by supervisory authorities.
Successful case: Support During a Scheduled Military Record Keeping Inspection by Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers
The Amount of Fines for Violations of Military Record Keeping and Their Legal Consequences
Legislation provides for significant financial penalties for violations of military record-keeping rules. The amount of the fine directly depends on the status of the person who committed the offense.
- For individuals, fines range from UAH 17,000 to 25,500.
- For employers, company officials, and legal entities, fines range from UAH 34,000 to 59,500.
In practice, these amounts are most often imposed on company directors, specialists responsible for military record keeping, and businesses as a whole.
Please note! A fine for violations of military record keeping is not a one time penalty. Sanctions may be applied separately for each identified violation or for repeated violations within the same year. If systemic issues exist, the total amounts can become critical for a company’s budget.
In addition to direct financial losses, being held liable leads to further legal consequences, including increased scrutiny from Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers, a higher risk of repeat inspections, and more complicated interactions with supervisory bodies, particularly in matters related to employee reservations.
For businesses, such sanctions are not merely a “bill to be paid,” but a clear signal of systemic weaknesses in the organization of military record keeping. This is why the issue of fine amounts is closely tied to the need for legal analysis of the grounds for their imposition and an assessment of the possibility of appeal, as in practice not every administrative decision is lawful or properly documented.
Paying the fine and “closing the issue” of military record keeping is a dangerous illusion
Many companies mistakenly believe that it is cheaper and easier to pay a fine once than to systematically organize military record keeping. In practice, this approach only increases business risks.
First, paying a fine does not resolve the issue. Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers will still set clear deadlines for correcting the violations. This means that:
- military records will have to be brought into compliance;
- time and money will have to be spent again;
- but now under pressure and within tight timeframes.
Second, the company automatically falls under increased scrutiny. Once violations are recorded:
- the business is placed under enhanced monitoring;
- the likelihood of unplanned inspections increases;
- each subsequent mistake may cost significantly more than properly organizing military records from the start.
Third, financial and reputational losses accumulate. Fines, lost working time, stress for HR teams and management, and risks related to contracts and inspections all undermine the company’s stability.
When and Why to Contact a Lawyer
Military record keeping is a process that requires meticulous attention to detail. To avoid turning a company’s budget into a source of fine payments, it is essential to build an effective administrative model in which every document is in its proper place and every deadline is under control.
Because a significant share of fines for military record-keeping violations arises from procedural errors, legal support becomes a tool of financial protection:
- At the stage of receiving requests, orders, or notices from Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers. A properly defined legal position helps prevent mistakes in responses, incorrectly prepared documents, and related risks of fines. Professional legal review allows the company to assess the lawfulness of the authority’s demands and to build a compliant interaction model, often resolving the issue before any sanctions are imposed.
- At the defense stage. If an administrative protocol is drawn up or a fine is imposed, the involvement of a lawyer becomes critically important. In practice, many such decisions contain procedural violations that provide grounds for their cancellation. A lawyer evaluates the prospects of appeal, prepares the legal strategy, and represents the client both in pretrial proceedings and in court.
Our team works systematically with military record-keeping matters and interaction with Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Centers. We understand how fines are applied in practice, recognize common procedural violations by inspectors, and help both Ukrainian businesses and company officials minimize risks or defend their rights.
Do not wait until a mistake turns into financial loss. Protect your business in time. Submit a request now to receive an audit of your company’s military record-keeping system or full legal support.
Our clients
