Equipment Delivered but Buyer Refuses to Sign the Commissioning Act: How to Prove Contract Performance
Equipment suppliers often operate on a standard model: advance payment, delivery, commissioning works, training the buyer's personnel, signing acceptance acts, and final settlement. On paper, this appears logical. In practice, however, a complex situation may arise: the equipment is delivered, accepted, and actively used by the buyer, yet the buyer refuses to sign the commissioning or training acceptance act.
Following this, the buyer claims that the work was incomplete or training was not provided, withholding the remaining balance for the equipment.
This text is being translated.
Our clients
We are ready to help you!
Contact us by mail [email protected] or by filling out the form:Services on the topic of this material
Our publications on this matter
Other publications
The equipment has been delivered and is already in use, but the commissioning act remains unsigned and the final payment is withheld. The supplier’s position depends on evidence of completed work and properly documented actions after the buyer’s refusal.
What documents a private psychiatrist needs before seeing their first patients. We cover required forms, internal documents, and a checklist for preparing the practice.
A court dispute does not automatically make a counterparty unreliable, but enforcement significantly increases the risk. The amount, asset freezes, company’s role and connection to the proposed deal are decisive.
Legal tools to mitigate exposure prior to significant transactions. Guidelines for real estate audits, uncovering hidden pledges, and evaluating partner assets.
Our other authors
