Equipment Delivered but Buyer Refuses to Sign the Commissioning Act: How to Prove Contract Performance
Cost of services:
Reviews of our Clients
... our work on joint projects assured us of your high level of professionalism
Equipment suppliers often operate on a standard model: advance payment, delivery, commissioning works, training the buyer's personnel, signing acceptance acts, and final settlement. On paper, this appears logical. In practice, however, a complex situation may arise: the equipment is delivered, accepted, and actively used by the buyer, yet the buyer refuses to sign the commissioning or training acceptance act.
Following this, the buyer claims that the work was incomplete or training was not provided, withholding the remaining balance for the equipment.
Dear visitor,
the full text of this article is available only in Ukrainian and Russian versions. If you are interested in this issue and you want to get a paid consultation on the topic - contact us via the forms of communication, by phone or through any other convenient way.
With all respects,
Team of "Pravova dopomoga" law company
Our clients
We are ready to help you!
Contact us by mail [email protected] or by filling out the form:Services on the topic of this material
Our publications on this matter
Other publications
A foreign company can enter Ukraine’s reconstruction market through ProZorro, donor-funded tenders, a Ukrainian partner, or a direct investment project. Before committing resources, it should determine the procurement rules, market-entry structure, tax model, and contract risks.
A privacy policy alone does not show who can access personal data, how processing is logged, or what happens after a data breach. These internal controls and records become critical during an Ombudsman inspection.
en court cases may pose less risk than one major enforcement proceeding. What matters is the counterparty’s role, amounts involved, case status, asset seizures, and whether the disputes could affect performance of your deal.
A company register does not always reveal who ultimately controls a business. Before a major transaction, the ownership chain, beneficial owners, sanctions exposure, and reputational links should be checked.
Our other authors
